papers-we-love_papers-we-love/languages
swarnatonse aa2abaef3d
Fix broken haskell paper link (#752)
Fix link for `Monad transformers and modular interpreters`
2023-06-16 06:44:50 -04:00
..
C change source for Ritchie C Language paper (per github/josh-59) 2020-05-08 12:45:34 -04:00
C++ remove pdfs, normalize readme format [fix PR#540] 2020-03-29 15:49:06 -04:00
clojure Update README.md 2017-09-05 15:25:28 -04:00
domain-specific-languages Add the Sketch-n-Sketch paper (#412) 2016-08-29 20:56:18 -07:00
erlang restore link to "The History of Erlang" 2022-06-06 00:24:08 -04:00
Go remove pdfs, normalize readme format [fix PR#540] 2020-03-29 15:49:06 -04:00
haskell Fix broken haskell paper link (#752) 2023-06-16 06:44:50 -04:00
Java remove pdfs, normalize readme format [fix PR#540] 2020-03-29 15:49:06 -04:00
Ruby add specializing ruby paper (#700) 2022-12-08 06:45:24 -05:00
smalltalk Move languages into languages dir. Move 'tdd' dir into testing (#403) 2016-07-10 23:04:17 -04:00
README.md Rename "paradigm" and "plt" folders for findability (#561) 2019-09-04 06:38:53 -04:00
scp91-felleisen.ps.gz On the Expressive Power of Programming Languages (#553) 2019-07-13 17:20:54 -04:00

Programming Language Theory

Programming language theory (PLT) is a branch of computer science that deals with the design, implementation, analysis, characterization, and classification of programming languages and their individual features.

Included Papers

  • 📜 On the Expressive Power of Programming Languages sciencedirect(Matthias Felleisen): "The literature on programming languages contains an abundance of informal claims on the relative expressive power of programming languages, but there is no framework for formalizing such statements nor for deriving interesting consequences. As a first step in this direction, we develop a formal notion of expressiveness and investigate its properties. To demonstrate the theory's closeness to published intuitions on expressiveness, we analyze the expressive power of several extensions of functional languages. Based on these results, we believe that our system correctly captures many of the informal ideas on expressiveness, and that it constitutes a good basis for further research in this direction. " (abstract)