Summary:
Adds a new endpoint to update webhook.
Perform some refactoring to allow code reuse from endpoint allowing to _subscribe and _unsubscribe webhooks.
One aspect of webhook is that url are stored in the home db while the rest of the fields (tableRef, isReadyColRef, ...) are stored in sqlite. So care must be taken when updating fields, to properly rollback if anything should fail.
Follow up diff will bring UI to edit webhook list
Test Plan: Updated doc api server tests
Reviewers: jarek
Reviewed By: jarek
Subscribers: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3821
Summary:
By default editor inherits permission for a new document or workspace.
Now editor is added explicitly as an owner of a new doc or workspace.
Test Plan: Updated
Reviewers: georgegevoian, paulfitz
Reviewed By: georgegevoian, paulfitz
Subscribers: dsagal, paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3734
Summary:
Checking SCHEMA_EDIT permission when user wants to
update document's name.
Test Plan: New test
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3733
Summary:
- New /webhooks event that lists all webhooks in a document (available for owners),
- Monitoring webhooks usage and saving it in memory or Redis,
- Loosening _usubscribe API endpoint, so that the information returned from the /webhook endpoint is enough to unsubscribe,
- Owners can remove webhook without the unsubscribe key.
The endpoint lists all webhooks that are registered in a document, not just webhooks from a single table.
There are two status fields. First for the webhook, second for the last request attempt.
Webhook can have 5 statuses: 'idle', 'sending', 'retrying', 'postponed', 'error', which roughly describes what the
sendLoop is currently doing. The 'error' status describes a situation when all request attempts failed and the queue needs
to be drained, so some requests were dropped.
The last request status can only be: 'success', 'failure' or 'rejected'. Rejected means that the last batch was dropped because the
queue was too long.
Test Plan: New and updated tests
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3727
Summary:
Creating an API endpoint to cancel any queued webhook messages from
a document.
Test Plan: Updated
Reviewers: paulfitz, georgegevoian
Reviewed By: paulfitz, georgegevoian
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3713
Summary:
Guest editors added to a document were able to remove it. This limits this permission
by allowing only owners of a doc to delete it.
Test Plan: Updated
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Subscribers: dsagal, anaisconce
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3708
Summary:
The /replace endpoint was built with home-level access control in mind. Updates needed:
* Only an owner can now replace a document. Only owners are permitted to change granular access rules, and a document replacement could change granular access rules.
* For the document being substituted in: the user must have complete access to view all material within it.
Test Plan: extended test
Reviewers: georgegevoian, dsagal
Reviewed By: georgegevoian, dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3694
Summary:
Allow requests from untrusted origins instead of returning an error, but don't allow credentials (Cookie header) or API keys (Authorization header).
Allow setting the header `Content-type: application/json` as an alternative to `X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest` to make it easier for clients to make POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE requests without authentication.
Discussion: https://grist.slack.com/archives/C0234CPPXPA/p1666355281535479
Test Plan: Added and updated DocApi tests. Tested manually how this affects requests made from a browser.
Reviewers: paulfitz, dsagal
Reviewed By: paulfitz, dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3678
Summary:
- DocApi test for Allowed Origin was using a home server endpoint
- Fixing waitForServer, as gristApp can be unavailable for a moment when browser is refreshed
- Fixing MergedOrgs tests typing issue
Test Plan: Updated
Reviewers: cyprien, paulfitz
Reviewed By: cyprien, paulfitz
Subscribers: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3648
Summary:
This diff adds a new `BulkAddOrUpdateRecord` user action which is what is sounds like:
- A bulk version of the existing `AddOrUpdateRecord` action.
- Much more efficient for operating on many records than applying many individual actions.
- Column values are specified as maps from `colId` to arrays of values as usual.
- Produces bulk versions of `AddRecord` and `UpdateRecord` actions instead of many individual actions.
Examples of users wanting to use something like `AddOrUpdateRecord` with large numbers of records:
- https://grist.slack.com/archives/C0234CPPXPA/p1651789710290879
- https://grist.slack.com/archives/C0234CPPXPA/p1660743493480119
- https://grist.slack.com/archives/C0234CPPXPA/p1660333148491559
- https://grist.slack.com/archives/C0234CPPXPA/p1663069291726159
I tested what made many `AddOrUpdateRecord` actions slow in the first place. It was almost entirely due to producing many individual `AddRecord` user actions. About half of that time was for processing the resulting `AddRecord` doc actions. Lookups and updates were not a problem. With these changes, the slowness is gone.
The Python user action implementation is more complex but there are no surprises. The JS API now groups `records` based on the keys of `require` and `fields` so that `BulkAddOrUpdateRecord` can be applied to each group.
Test Plan: Update and extend Python and DocApi tests.
Reviewers: jarek, paulfitz
Reviewed By: jarek, paulfitz
Subscribers: jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3642
Summary:
This endpoint has started to fail when called between a pair
of doc workers. The simplest fix is to simply remove it, it serves no
purpose.
Test Plan: added basic deployment test
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Subscribers: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3636
XLSX export of active view / table
Co-authored-by: Louis Delbosc <louis.delbosc.prestataire@anct.gouv.fr>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Viers <vincent.viers@beta.gouv.fr>
Summary: This particular test fails often enough to be annoying but not often enough to be worrying. It's not clear why, but it seems like a race condition involving redis. Fixing the test 'properly' seems hard and not worth the effort. Looking at the past 20 Jenkins builds, I found this test failing once. If we assume that the probability of failing is 1/20 (it's probably less since the test actually runs 3 times with different server configurations) then the probability of failing 3 times independently is (1/20)^3 = 1/8000, so `this.retry(3)` seems like a good enough solution. See also: https://grist.slack.com/archives/C0234CPPXPA/p1652909955773049
Test Plan: Manually made the test fail randomly 90% of the time, in which case `this.retries(3)` was not usually enough to prevent failures, but `this.retries(300)` was.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Subscribers: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3595
Summary:
When a user requests to read the contents of an attachment, only allow the request if there exists a cell in an attachment column that contains the attachment and which they have read access to.
This does not cover:
* Granular write access for attachments. In particular, a user who can write to any attachment column should be considered to have full read access to all attachment columns, currently.
* Access control of attachment metadata such as name and format.
The implementation uses a sql query that requires a scan, and some notes on how this could be optimized in future. The web client was updated to specify the cell to check for access, and performance seemed fine in casual testing on a doc with 1000s of attachments. I'm not sure how performance would hold up as the set of access rules grows as well.
Test Plan: added tests
Reviewers: alexmojaki
Reviewed By: alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3490
Summary:
Building:
- Builds no longer wait for tsc for either client, server, or test targets. All use esbuild which is very fast.
- Build still runs tsc, but only to report errors. This may be turned off with `SKIP_TSC=1` env var.
- Grist-core continues to build using tsc.
- Esbuild requires ES6 module semantics. Typescript's esModuleInterop is turned
on, so that tsc accepts and enforces correct usage.
- Client-side code is watched and bundled by webpack as before (using esbuild-loader)
Code changes:
- Imports must now follow ES6 semantics: `import * as X from ...` produces a
module object; to import functions or class instances, use `import X from ...`.
- Everything is now built with isolatedModules flag. Some exports were updated for it.
Packages:
- Upgraded browserify dependency, and related packages (used for the distribution-building step).
- Building the distribution now uses esbuild's minification. babel-minify is no longer used.
Test Plan: Should have no behavior changes, existing tests should pass, and docker image should build too.
Reviewers: georgegevoian
Reviewed By: georgegevoian
Subscribers: alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3506
Summary:
- Substantial refactoring of the logic when the server fails to send some
messages to a client.
- Add seqId numbers to server messages to ensure reliable order.
- Add a needReload flag in clientConnect for a clear indication whent the
browser client needs to reload the app.
- Reproduce some potential failure scenarios in a test case (some of which
previously could have led to incorrectly ordered messages).
- Convert other Comm tests to typescript.
- Tweak logging of Comm and Client to be slightly more concise (in particular,
avoid logging sessionId)
Note that despite the big refactoring, this only addresses a fairly rare
situation, with websocket failures while server is trying to send to the
client. It includes no improvements for failures while the client is sending to
the server.
(I looked for an existing library that would take care of these issues. A relevant article I found is https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-web-pubsub/howto-develop-reliable-clients, but it doesn't include a library for both ends, and is still in review. Other libraries with similar purposes did not inspire enough confidence.)
Test Plan: New test cases, which reproduce some previously problematic scenarios.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3470
Summary: Combines the code and behaviour of the existing endpoints `GET /records` (for the general shape of the result and the parameters for sort/filter/limit etc) and retrieving a specific attachment with `GET /attachments/:id` for handling fields specific to attachments.
Test Plan: Added a DocApi test. Also updated one test to use the new endpoint instead of raw `GET /tables/_grist_Attachments/records`.
Reviewers: cyprien
Reviewed By: cyprien
Subscribers: cyprien
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3443
Summary:
DocApi tests occasionally fail in a confusing way due to redis
state. This resets the redis state at the beginning of the test.
Test Plan: existing tests pass
Reviewers: alexmojaki
Reviewed By: alexmojaki
Subscribers: alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3424
Summary:
Adds attachment and data size to the usage section of
the raw data page. Also makes in-document usage banners
update as user actions are applied, causing them to be
hidden/shown or updated based on the current state of
the document.
Test Plan: Browser tests.
Reviewers: jarek
Reviewed By: jarek
Subscribers: alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3395
Summary: Allow exceeding the daily API usage limit for a doc based on additional allocations for the current hour and minute. See the doc comment on getDocApiUsageKeysToIncr for details. This means that up to 5 redis keys may be relevant at a time for a single document.
Test Plan: Updated and expanded 'Daily API Limit' tests.
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3368
Summary:
Call ActiveDoc.removeUnusedAttachments every hour using setInterval, and in ActiveDoc.shutdown (which also clears said interval).
Unrelated: small fix to my webhooks code which was creating a redis client on shutdown just to quit it.
Test Plan:
Tweaked DocApi test to remove expired attachments by force-reloading the doc, so that it removes them during shutdown. Extracted a new testing endpoint /verifyFiles to support this test (previously running that code only happened with `/removeUnused?verifyfiles=1`).
Tested the setInterval part manually.
Reviewers: paulfitz, dsagal
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Subscribers: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3387
Summary: Adds methods to delete metadata rows based on timeDeleted. The flag expiredOnly determines if it only deletes attachments that were soft-deleted 7 days ago, or just all soft-deleted rows. Then any actual file data that doesn't have matching metadata is deleted.
Test Plan: DocApi test
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Subscribers: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3364
Summary:
Builds on https://phab.getgrist.com/D3352
Add DocStorage.scanAttachmentsForUsageChanges to do fancy JSON query to find all attachment metadata rows whose soft deletion status needs updating.
Add ActiveDoc.updateUsedAttachments which uses the above and then applies the appropriate user action if needed to soft delete/undelete metadata rows.
Add endpoint in DocApi calling ActiveDoc method.
Test Plan: Added DocApi test
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3357
* remove stray redis dependency in test
* tweak handling of database connection between tests
* upgrade node versions in tests, type guessing in node 10 has problems
Summary:
This shuffles some server tests to make them available in grist-core,
and adds a test for the `GRIST_PROXY_AUTH_HEADER` feature added in
https://github.com/gristlabs/grist-core/pull/165
It includes a fix for a header normalization issue for websocket connections.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: georgegevoian
Reviewed By: georgegevoian
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3326
