Summary:
Changes the minimum version of Node to 18, and updates the Docker images and GitHub workflows to build Grist with Node 18.
Also updates various dependencies and scripts to support building running tests with arm64 builds of Node.
Test Plan: Existing tests.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3968
Summary: Using standard tost notification, message about webhook queue being overflown was added. message is permanent as long as queue is full. Message contains linkt to the webhook setings
Test Plan: two nbrowser test was added - one to check if message is show when queue is full, and second to check if message is dismiss when queue was cleaned.
Reviewers: georgegevoian
Reviewed By: georgegevoian
Subscribers: jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3929
Summary:
This uses a newer version of mocha in grist-core so that tests can be run in parallel. That allows more tests to be moved without slowing things down overall. Tests moved are venerable browser tests; only the ones that "just work" or worked without too much trouble to are moved, in order to keep the diff from growing too large. Will wrestle with more in follow up.
Parallelism is at the file level, rather than the individual test.
The newer version of mocha isn't needed for grist-saas repo; tests are parallelized in our internal CI by other means. I've chosen to allocate files to workers in a cruder way than our internal CI, based on initial characters rather than an automated process. The automated process would need some reworking to be compatible with mocha running in parallel mode.
Test Plan: this diff was tested first on grist-core, then ported to grist-saas so saas repo history will correctly track history of moved files.
Reviewers: jarek
Reviewed By: jarek
Subscribers: jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3927
Summary:
Some edits to virtual tables (such as webhook lists) happen
via a route that was not yet handled. Actually Cyprien (the
original author) had handled this case but it got removed
because I didn't know what it was for :-). This brings back
support for edits by this route.
Test Plan: added a test
Reviewers: georgegevoian
Reviewed By: georgegevoian
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3924
Summary:
Now that webhook payload delivery can be done using a proxy,
it may be desirable to no longer require a set of `ALLOWED_WEBHOOK_DOMAINS`.
This diff allows this variable to be set to `*`. With this setting,
any domain, and both `http` and `https` protocols will now be accepted.
Another possibility would be to default to unchecked
behavior if `ALLOWED_WEBHOOK_DOMAINS` is not set. But this would
introduce a new kind of vulnerability to unconfigured Grist
installations.
Test Plan: switched a test from naming a domain to using `*`
Reviewers: jarek
Reviewed By: jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3903
Summary:
This adds a UI panel for managing webhooks. Work started by Cyprien Pindat. You can find the UI on a document's settings page. Main changes relative to Cyprien's demo:
* Changed behavior of virtual table to be more consistent with the rest of Grist, by factoring out part of the implementation of on-demand tables.
* Cell values that would create an error can now be denied and reverted (as for the rest of Grist).
* Changes made by other users are integrated in a sane way.
* Basic undo/redo support is added using the regular undo/redo stack.
* The table list in the drop-down is now updated if schema changes.
* Added a notification from back-end when webhook status is updated so constant polling isn't needed to support multi-user operation.
* Factored out webhook specific logic from general virtual table support.
* Made a bunch of fixes to various broken behavior.
* Added tests.
The code remains somewhat unpolished, and behavior in the presence of errors is imperfect in general but may be adequate for this case.
I assume that we'll soon be lifting the restriction on the set of domains that are supported for webhooks - otherwise we'd want to provide some friendly way to discover that list of supported domains rather than just throwing an error.
I don't actually know a lot about how the front-end works - it looks like tables/columns/fields/sections can be safely added if they have string ids that won't collide with bone fide numeric ids from the back end. Sneaky.
Contains a migration, so needs an extra reviewer for that.
Test Plan: added tests
Reviewers: jarek, dsagal
Reviewed By: jarek, dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3856
