(core) forward more kinds of edits to a virtual table

Summary:
Some edits to virtual tables (such as webhook lists) happen
via a route that was not yet handled. Actually Cyprien (the
original author) had handled this case but it got removed
because I didn't know what it was for :-). This brings back
support for edits by this route.

Test Plan: added a test

Reviewers: georgegevoian

Reviewed By: georgegevoian

Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3924
This commit is contained in:
Paul Fitzpatrick 2023-06-15 16:12:19 -04:00
parent d88f79bc5e
commit 7d3b4b49d5
3 changed files with 34 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
import {DocComm} from 'app/client/components/DocComm';
import {MetaTableData, TableData} from 'app/client/models/TableData';
import {ApplyUAOptions, ApplyUAResult} from 'app/common/ActiveDocAPI';
import {CellValue, TableDataAction, UserAction} from 'app/common/DocActions';
import {CellValue, getTableId, isDataAction, TableDataAction, UserAction} from 'app/common/DocActions';
import {DocData as BaseDocData} from 'app/common/DocData';
import {SchemaTypes} from 'app/common/schema';
import {ColTypeMap} from 'app/common/TableData';
@ -192,9 +192,22 @@ export class DocData extends BaseDocData {
// See documentation of sendActions().
private async _sendActionsImpl(actions: UserAction[], optDesc?: string): Promise<any[]> {
if (this._virtualTablesFunc?.has(actions[0]?.[1] as any)) {
// It would be easy to pass along actions, but we don't need this functionality yet.
throw new Error('_sendActionsImpl needs updating to direct actions to virtual tables');
const tableName = String(actions[0]?.[1]);
if (this._virtualTablesFunc?.has(tableName)) {
// Actions applying to virtual tables are handled directly by their TableData instance.
for (const action of actions) {
if (!isDataAction(action)) {
throw new Error('virtual table received an action it cannot handle');
}
if (getTableId(action) !== tableName) {
throw new Error('virtual table actions mixed with other actions');
}
}
const tableActions = actions.map(a => [a[0], ...a.slice(2)]);
// The type on sendTableActions seems kind of misleading, and
// only working because UserAction is defined weakly. The first
// thing the method does is splice back in the table names...
return this.getTable(tableName)!.sendTableActions(tableActions, optDesc);
}
const eventData = {actions};
this.sendActionsEmitter.emit(eventData);

View File

@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ export function isSchemaAction(action: DocAction):
return SCHEMA_ACTIONS.has(action[0]);
}
export function isDataAction(action: DocAction):
export function isDataAction(action: DocAction|UserAction):
action is AddRecord | RemoveRecord | UpdateRecord |
BulkAddRecord | BulkRemoveRecord | BulkUpdateRecord |
ReplaceTableData | TableDataAction {
return DATA_ACTIONS.has(action[0]);
return DATA_ACTIONS.has(String(action[0]));
}
/**

View File

@ -249,6 +249,21 @@ describe('WebhookPage', function () {
await driver.close();
await driver.switchTo().window(ownerTab);
});
/**
* Checks that a particular route to modifying cells in a virtual table
* is in place (previously it was not).
*/
it('can paste into a cell without clicking into it', async function() {
await openWebhookPage();
await setField(1, 'Name', '1234');
await gu.waitForServer();
await gu.sendKeys(await gu.copyKey());
await gu.getDetailCell({col: 'Memo', rowNum: 1}).click();
await gu.sendKeys(await gu.pasteKey());
await gu.waitForServer();
assert.equal(await getField(1, 'Memo'), '1234');
});
});
async function setField(rowNum: number, col: string, text: string) {