Summary:
This makes it possible to set the type of a column to ReferenceList, but the UI is terrible
ReferenceList.ts is a mishmash of ChoiceList and Reference that sort of works but something about the CSS is clearly broken
ReferenceListEditor is just a text editor, you have to type in a JSON array of row IDs. Ignore the value that's present when you start editing. I can maybe try mashing together ReferenceEditor and ChoiceListEditor but it doesn't seem wise.
I think @georgegevoian should take over here. Reviewing the diff as it is to check for obvious issues is probably good but I don't think it's worth trying to land/merge anything.
Test Plan: none
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Subscribers: georgegevoian
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2914
Summary:
- Update styling of label, id, and "derived ID from label" checkbox.
- Implement a label which shows 'Data Column' vs 'Formula Column' vs 'Empty Column',
and a dropdown with column actions (such as Clear/Convert)
- Implement new formula display in the side-panel, and open the standard
FormulaEditor when clicked.
- Remove old FieldConfigTab, of which now very little would be used.
- Fix up remaining code that relied on it (RefSelect)
Test Plan: Fixed old tests, added new browser cases, and a case for a new helper function.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2757
Summary:
- Add headers to tables.
- Change styles to reduce boxes-within-boxes.
- Add validation of table and column IDs, both in UI and on server when saving rules.
- Add autocomplete for tables/columns used for UserAttribute rules.
- Add a fancy widget to set permission bits.
Test Plan: Updated browser test for new UI, added a test case for user attributes.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2695
Summary:
This moves all client code to core, and makes minimal fix-ups to
get grist and grist-core to compile correctly. The client works
in core, but I'm leaving clean-up around the build and bundles to
follow-up.
Test Plan: existing tests pass; server-dev bundle looks sane
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2627
