Summary:
With this change, if a comment is added to an ACL formula, then that comment will be offered to the user if access is denied and that rule could potentially have granted access.
The code is factored so that when access is permitted, or when partially visible tables are being filtered, there is little overhead. Comments are gathered only when an explicit denial of access.
Test Plan: added tests, updated tests
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2730
Summary:
- This replaces the message "Unexpected Error / Access Denied / Report a problem" with a
one-line "Blocked by access rules".
Test Plan: Only tested manually
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2712
Summary:
For methods other than `GET`, `HEAD`, and `OPTIONS`, allow cookie-based authentication only if a certain custom header is present.
Specifically, we check that `X-Requested-With` is set to `XMLHttpRequest`. This is somewhat arbitrary, but allows us to use https://expressjs.com/en/api.html#req.xhr.
A request send from a browser that sets a custom header will prompt a preflight check, giving us a chance to check if the origin is trusted.
This diff deals with getting the header in place. There will be more work to do after this:
* Make sure that all important endpoints are checking origin. Skimming code, /api endpoint check origin, and some but not all others.
* Add tests spot-testing origin checks.
* Check on cases that authenticate differently.
- Check the websocket endpoint - it can be connected to from an arbitrary site; there is per-doc access control but probably better to lock it down more.
- There may be old endpoints that authenticate based on knowledge of a client id rather than cookies.
Test Plan: added a test
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2631
Summary:
This moves all client code to core, and makes minimal fix-ups to
get grist and grist-core to compile correctly. The client works
in core, but I'm leaving clean-up around the build and bundles to
follow-up.
Test Plan: existing tests pass; server-dev bundle looks sane
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2627
