Summary:
- Support schema changes in the presence of non-trivial ACL rules.
- Fix update of `aclFormulaParsed` when updating formulas automatically after schema change.
- Filter private metadata in broadcasts, not just fetches. Censorship method is unchanged, just refactored.
- Allow only owners to change ACL rules.
- Force reloads if rules are changed.
- Track rule changes within bundle, for clarity during schema changes - tableId and colId changes create a muddle otherwise.
- Show or forbid pages dynamically depending on user's access to its sections. Logic unchanged, just no longer requires reload.
- Fix calculation of pre-existing rows touched by a bundle, in the presence of schema changes.
- Gray out acl page for non-owners.
Test Plan: added tests
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2734
Summary:
- Factored out ACLRuleCollection into its own file, and use for building UI.
- Moved AccessRules out of UserManager to a page linked from left panel.
- Changed default RulePart to be the last part of a rule for simpler code.
- Implemented much of the UI for adding/deleting rules.
- For now, editing the ACLFormula and Permissions is done using text inputs.
- Implemented saving rules by syncing a bundle of them.
- Fixed DocData to clean up action bundle in case of an early error.
Test Plan: WIP planning to add some new browser tests for the UI
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2678
Summary:
This implements row-level access control for outgoing messages, replacing the document reloading placeholder that was there before.
* Prior to broadcasting messages, GranularAccess is notified of actions+undo.
* While broadcasting messages to different sessions, if we find we need row level access control information, rows before and after the change are reconstructed.
* Messages are rewritten if rows that were previously forbidden are now allowed, and vice versa.
The diff is somewhat under-tested and under-optimized. Next step would be to implement row-level access control for incoming actions, which may result in some rejiggering of the code from this diff to avoid duplication of effort under some conditions.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2670
