Summary:
This unsets the `direct` flag for actions emitted when summary tables are updated. That means those actions will be ignored for access control purposes. So if a user has the right to change a source table, the resulting changes to the summary won't result in the overall action bundle being forbidden.
I don't think I've actually seen the use case that inspired this issue being filed. I could imagine perhaps a user forbidden from creating rows globally making permitted updates that could add rows in a summary (and it being desirable to allow that).
Test Plan: added tests
Reviewers: jarek
Reviewed By: jarek
Subscribers: dsagal, alexmojaki, jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3022
Summary:
The import dialog now has an option to 'Update existing records',
which when checked will allow for selection of 1 or more fields
to match source and destination tables on.
If all fields match, then the matched record in the
destination table will be merged with the incoming record
from the source table. This means the incoming values will
replace the destination table values, unless the incoming
values are blank.
Additional merge strategies are implemented in the data
engine, but the import dialog only uses one of the
strategies currently. The others can be exposed in the UI
in the future, and tweak the behavior of how source
and destination values should be merged in different contexts,
such as when blank values exist.
Test Plan: Python and browser tests.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Subscribers: alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3020
Summary:
Prefix keys of `LinkingState.filterColValues` with `_contains:` when the source column is a ChoiceList or ReferenceList.
This is parsed out to make a boolean `isContainsFilter` which is kept in each value of `QueryRefs.filterTuples` (previously `filterPairs`).
Then when converting back in `convertQueryFromRefs` we construct `Query.contains: {[colId: string]: boolean}`.
Finally `getFilterFunc` uses `Query.contains` to decide what kind of filtering to do.
This is not pretty, but the existing code is already very complex and it was hard to find something that wouldn't require touching loads of code just to make things compile.
Test Plan: Added a new nbrowser test and fixture, tests that selecting a source table by summary tables grouped by a choicelist column, non-list column, and both all filter the correct data.
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2940
Summary:
API signature for autocomplete updated to add column ID, which is
necessary for exposing correct types for 'value'.
Test Plan: Unit tests.
Reviewers: alexmojaki
Reviewed By: alexmojaki
Subscribers: jarek, alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2896
Summary: Removed test/aws/, most of app/server/lib/, 3 dirs in app/lambda/, corresponding tests, and more!
Test Plan: a lot of this is quite the opposite...
Reviewers: dsagal, paulfitz
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2894
Summary:
This is a somewhat experimental change, that will implement permitted parts of an undo if not all parts are permitted. This is in preparation for trigger columns, where it may become common for a change in a record resulting in a change to an automatic change to another that the user cannot edit directly. How to undo such an action is somewhat unclear. One option is to undo the permitted parts, and then the triggers can rerun.
The general case is a bit of a can of worms, and feels adjacent to merging/rebasing etc.
Oh: it would probably be important in general to communicate to the user that an undo was partial, but this diff doesn't do that. It would need some new plumbing.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2839
Summary:
This particular combination of features is not built out - data will be
censored but changes to data will not. So the user will now get an error
if they try to do it. Existing rules of this kind will continue to
operate as before, and can be set via the api.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2751
Summary:
The goal is that those who can edit ACL rules can create or change rules for
any resource, even if the rules block their own ability to see the resource.
Test Plan: Added a browser test, and a server test for who can call the new method.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2703
Summary:
- Fix error-handling in bundleActions(), and wait for the full bundle to complete.
(The omissions here were making it impossibly to react to errors from inside bundleActions())
- Catch problematic rules early enough to undo them, by trying out ruleCollection.update()
on updated rules before the updates are applied.
- Added checkAclFormula() call to DocComm that checks parsing and compiling
formula, and reports errors.
- In UI, prevent saving if any aclFormulas are invalid, or while waiting for the to get checked.
- Also fixed some lint errors
Test Plan: Added a test case of error reporting in ACL formulas.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2689
Summary:
- Implemented selecting an org in some cases when using Save-Copy dialog.
- Unified previous 'Save Copy' menu into an enhanced "Share" menu.
- Renamed ExportMenu to ShareMenu, collect related code into it, and design the share button.
- Introduced trunkAccess property for forks, to know whether "Replace Original" is available.
- Simplified handling of fork() result, now that all code has been upgraded.
- Replaced 'Copy as Template' menu items with a checkbox in the Save-Copy dialog
- Removed copy links for examples in the DocMenu (to simplify, since not part of updated design)
- Updated the UI of the copying dialog.
Test Plan: Updated affected tests, added new test cases for copying when other orgs are a choice or not.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2561
Summary: This moves enough server material into core to run a home server. The data engine is not yet incorporated (though in manual testing it works when ported).
Test Plan: existing tests pass
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2552
