Summary:
Fixes a bug noted here: https://grist.slack.com/archives/C069RUP71/p1662564341132349
This bug could happen quite easily as follows:
1. Have a formula in a summary table such as `$group.amount`. Typically there's also a `SUM` but that's not essential.
2. Find a group with nonzero values of `amount`.
3. Delete all rows in that group in the source table. Typically that just means one row in a lonely group.
4. The summary table row is automatically deleted.
5. Try to undo. This raises an error about trying to update a non-existent summary table row.
I tried to account for this undo problem in https://phab.getgrist.com/D3489 by not saving the updated value for `$group` when it was found to be empty. The reason this was insufficient is that `$group.amount` is immediately invalidated anyway when the source row(s) are deleted (I think because that's just how dependency relations involving references work) *and* the calculated value of `$group.amount` changes even if `$group` doesn't. For example, `$group.amount` may have previously been `[100, 200]`. After deleting the rows, `$group.amount` becomes `[0, 0]`. Keeping `$group` unchanged prevents `$group.amount` from just being `[]`, but deleting the source rows means that the amounts become the numeric default `0` which is still a change. This change in value is then noted which leads to saving an undo action to update the summary table record. All this happens in step 3 above, and the summary record is only deleted after that point.
This diff removes that special handling for `group` and instead adds a more general fix to `action_summary.py`. This inserts undo actions for deleted rows at the beginning of the undo list rather than at the end, which was already done for deleted tables and columns.
Test Plan: Python tests
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Subscribers: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3626
Summary: Extend formula error messages with explanations from https://github.com/friendly-traceback/friendly-traceback. Only for Python 3.
Test Plan: Updated several Python tests. In general, these require separate branches for Python 2 and 3.
Reviewers: georgegevoian
Reviewed By: georgegevoian
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3542
Summary: This is the first step towards raw data views, merely adding metadata without any UI. Every 'normal' table now has a widget referenced by `rawViewSectionRef`. It has no parent view/page and cannot actually be viewed for now. The widget is created during the AddTable user action, and the migration creates a widget for existing tables.
Test Plan: Many tests had to be updated, especially tests that listed all view sections and/or fields.
Reviewers: jarek, dsagal
Reviewed By: jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3232
Summary:
["RenameChoices", table_id, col_id, renames]
Updates the data in a Choice/ChoiceList column to reflect the new choice names.
`renames` should be a dict of `{old_choice_name: new_choice_name}`.
This doesn't touch the choices configuration in widgetOptions, that must be done separately.
Frontend to be done in another diff.
Test Plan: Added two Python unit tests.
Reviewers: jarek
Reviewed By: jarek
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3050
Summary:
Traceback is available on the Creator Panel in the formula editor. It is evaluated the same way as for normal formulas.
In case when the traceback is not available, only the error name is displayed with information that traceback is not available.
Cell with an error, when edited, shows the previous valid value that was used before the error happened (or None for new rows).
Value is stored inside the RaisedException object that is stored in a cell.
Test Plan: Created tests
Reviewers: alexmojaki
Reviewed By: alexmojaki
Subscribers: alexmojaki, dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3033
Summary:
The 'user' variable has a similar API to the one from access rules: it
contains properties about a user, such as their full name and email
address, as well as optional, user-defined attributes that are populated
via user attribute tables.
Test Plan: Python unit tests.
Reviewers: alexmojaki, paulfitz, dsagal
Reviewed By: alexmojaki, dsagal
Subscribers: paulfitz, dsagal, alexmojaki
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2898
Summary:
Trigger formulas can be calculated for new records, or for new records and
updates to certain fields, or all fields. They do not recalculate on open,
and they MAY be set directly by the user, including for data-cleaning.
- Column metadata now includes recalcWhen and recalcDeps fields.
- Trigger formulas are NOT recalculated on open or on schema changes.
- When recalcWhen is "never", formula isn't calculated even for new records.
- When recalcWhen is "allupdates", formula is calculated for new records and
any manual (non-formula) updates to the record.
- When recalcWhen is "", formula is calculated for new records, and changes to
recalcDeps fields (which may be formula fields or column itself).
- A column whose recalcDeps includes itself is a "data-cleaning" column; a
value set by the user will still trigger the formula.
- All trigger-formulas receive a "value" argument (to support the case above).
Small changes
- Update RefLists (used for recalcDeps) when target rows are deleted.
- Add RecordList.__contains__ (for `rec in refList` or `id in refList` checks)
- Clarify that Calculate action has replaced load_done() in practice,
and use it in tests too, to better match reality.
Left for later:
- UI for setting recalcWhen / recalcDeps.
- Implementation of actions such as "Recalculate for all cells".
- Allowing trigger-formulas access to the current user's info.
Test Plan: Added a comprehensive python-side test for various trigger combinations
Reviewers: paulfitz, alexmojaki
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2872
Summary: Changes that move towards python 3 compatibility that are easy to review without much thought
Test Plan: The tests
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2873
Summary:
This diff discounts indirect changes for access control purposes. A UserAction that updates a cell A, which in turn causes changes in other dependent cells, will be considered a change to cell A for access control purposes.
The `engine.apply_user_actions` method now returns a `direct` array, with a boolean for each `stored` action, set to `true` if the action is attributed to the user or `false` if it is attributed to the engine. `GranularAccess` ignores actions attributed to the engine when checking for edit rights.
Subtleties:
* Removal of references to a removed row are considered direct changes.
* Doesn't play well with undos as yet. An action that indirectly modifies a cell the user doesn't have rights to may succeed, but it will not be reversible.
Test Plan: added tests, updated tests
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2806
Summary:
- Introduce a new SQLiteDB migration, which adds DB columns for formula columns
- Newly added columns have the special ['P'] (pending) value in them
(in order to show the usual "Loading..." on the first load that triggers the migration)
- Calculated values are added to .stored/.undo fields of user actions.
- Various changes made in the sandbox to include .stored/.undo in the right order.
- OnDemand tables ignore stored formula columns, replacing them with special SQL as before
- In particular, converting to OnDemand table leaves stale values in those
columns, we should maybe clean those out.
Some tweaks on the side:
- Allow overriding chai assertion truncateThreshold with CHAI_TRUNCATE_THRESHOLD
- Rebuild python automatically in watch mode
Test Plan: Fixed various tests, updated some fixtures. Many python tests that check actions needed adjustments because actions moved from .stored to .undo. Some checks added to catch situations previously only caught in browser tests.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2645
Summary:
this moves sandbox/grist to core, and adds a requirements.txt
file for reconstructing the content of sandbox/thirdparty.
Test Plan:
existing tests pass.
Tested core functionality manually. Tested docker build manually.
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2563
