Summary:
An incorrect DocAction (as possible from an Undo of a non-last action)
could cause RemoveRecord on an already missing record. This used to
create an invalid undo, and wreak havoc when a series of DocActions
later fails and needs to be reverted.
To fix, consider RemoveRecord of a missing record to be a no-op.
Test Plan: Includes a new test case that triggers the problem.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2717
Summary:
Currently, an undo of a non-last action can leave the doc in an inconsistent
state. For example, it may remove a table, but fail to remove all columns of
it from metadata. We normally check that schema corresponds to metadata, but
stray columns were not visible to this check, and instead caused later table
additions to fail.
This diff fixes the check to fail the action that causes stray columns, and
to restore the doc to a consistent state.
Note that this only handles schema-metadata inconsistencies, but an undo of a
non-last action can easily create other surprises.
Test Plan: Added a test case that triggered inconsistency before, and now triggers a failed undo.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2715
Summary:
- When adding records, negative rowIds may now be specified. They'll be replaced by proper IDs.
- If these negative IDs are used in Reference columns in subsequent actions in
the same bundle of UserActions, they get replaced with the proper rowIds.
- Use this to sync ACLResources and ACLRules from UI in a single batch of UserActions.
- Resolve the TODOs in GranularAccess test, to no longer need to guess resource rowIds.
Test Plan: Added a python unittest for mapping IDs; updated browser tests.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2691
Summary:
The new plans for granular access control are different and handled by
node.js. Some of the same tables will be reused, of which we never made
real use before except for expecting certain specific initial records.
This diff removes the old logic, replacing it with a stub that satisfies
the interface expected by other code.
It also removes several unused UserActions: AddUser/RemoveUser/
AddInstance/RemoveInstance.
Test Plan: Existing tests should pass.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2662
Summary:
- Introduce a new SQLiteDB migration, which adds DB columns for formula columns
- Newly added columns have the special ['P'] (pending) value in them
(in order to show the usual "Loading..." on the first load that triggers the migration)
- Calculated values are added to .stored/.undo fields of user actions.
- Various changes made in the sandbox to include .stored/.undo in the right order.
- OnDemand tables ignore stored formula columns, replacing them with special SQL as before
- In particular, converting to OnDemand table leaves stale values in those
columns, we should maybe clean those out.
Some tweaks on the side:
- Allow overriding chai assertion truncateThreshold with CHAI_TRUNCATE_THRESHOLD
- Rebuild python automatically in watch mode
Test Plan: Fixed various tests, updated some fixtures. Many python tests that check actions needed adjustments because actions moved from .stored to .undo. Some checks added to catch situations previously only caught in browser tests.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2645
Summary:
- Make suggestions less case-sensitive (not entirely case-insensitive, but
allow top-level suggestions to match in all-lowercase)
- Add function signatures to suggestions for Grist functions.
- Excel-like functions that are present but not implemented are no longer
offered as suggestions.
Test Plan:
Added a test case on python side, and a browser test case for how suggestions
are rendered and inserted.
Reviewers: paulfitz
Reviewed By: paulfitz
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2608
Summary:
this moves sandbox/grist to core, and adds a requirements.txt
file for reconstructing the content of sandbox/thirdparty.
Test Plan:
existing tests pass.
Tested core functionality manually. Tested docker build manually.
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2563
Dmitry S
Paul Fitzpatrick