Summary:
Add rowCount returned from sandbox when applying user actions to ActionGroup which is broadcast to clients.
Add rowCount to ActiveDoc and update it after applying user actions.
Add rowCount to OpenLocalDocResult using ActiveDoc value, to show when a client opens a doc before any user actions happen.
Add rowCount observable to DocPageModel which is set when the doc is opened and when action groups are received.
Add crude UI (commented out) in Tool.ts showing the row count and the limit in AppModel.currentFeatures. The actual UI doesn't have a place to go yet.
Followup tasks:
- Real, pretty UI
- Counts per table
- Keep count(s) secret from users with limited access?
- Data size indicator?
- Banner when close to or above limit
- Measure row counts outside of sandbox to avoid spoofing with formula
- Handle changes to the limit when the plan is changed or extra rows are purchased
Test Plan: Tested UI manually, including with free team site, opening a fresh doc, opening an initialised doc, adding rows, undoing, and changes from another tab. Automated tests seem like they should wait for a proper UI.
Reviewers: georgegevoian
Reviewed By: georgegevoian
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3318
Summary:
This removes the need for any information drawn from the content of recent actions when loading a document.
The undo/redo system does need some facts about recent actions up front. But that system has an important restriction: only actions a particular client is known to have generated can be undone by that client.
So in this diff, as we store which client has performed an action, we also store the few pieces of metadata about that action that the undo/redo system needs: `linkId`, `otherId`, `rowIdHint`, `isUndo` fields. These are all small integers (or in one case a boolean).
An existing limitation is that information about which client has performed which action is stored in memory in the worker, and not persisted anywhere. This diff does not change that limitation, meaning that undos continue to not survive a worker transition. A reasonable way to deal with that would be to back the store with redis.
Test Plan: existing tests pass
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D3044
Summary: This moves enough server material into core to run a home server. The data engine is not yet incorporated (though in manual testing it works when ported).
Test Plan: existing tests pass
Reviewers: dsagal
Reviewed By: dsagal
Differential Revision: https://phab.getgrist.com/D2552
